Skip to content
Clinch — Deal Experience

The PDF you've been sending was never the deal. It was the compromise.

Every relationship you spent months building — the trust, the conversations, the follow-through — gets compressed into a flat PDF at the moment it matters most. It disappears into an inbox. It looks like every other document your client received that week. You know this. You've known it for years. The reason you haven't fixed it: every alternative meant another tool, another login, another integration tax. Clinch isn't another tool. It's the deal surface of the platform that already runs your CRM, calendar, meetings, emails, e-signatures, and billing. Nothing to integrate. The deal experience lives where the relationship already lives.

0 open visibility
Zero integrations required
One platform boundary
See how Clinch works Schedule a walkthrough
02 The integration tax

Every alternative kept you in the PDF world for the same reason

The problem was never capability. It was architecture. Every standalone proposal tool demanded the same thing: integration work that cost more than the PDFs it was meant to replace.

Every interactive proposal tool you've evaluated is a separate product. Its own login. Its own user model. Its own data layer. To make it useful, you'd need to connect it to your CRM — one integration. Your calendar — another. Your e-signature tool — another. Your invoicing system — another. Your onboarding workflows — another.

Each integration is a maintenance contract. Each one is a place where data can drift, syncs can break, and vendor updates can require your attention on a Tuesday morning when you should be closing deals.

Inside Zyntro, the architecture is different. The CRM that Clinch reads from is the same CRM you already use. The calendar that surfaces meeting outcomes is the same calendar. Docli handles the e-signature. Edge produces the invoice. Flow orchestrates onboarding. The integration count isn't low — it's zero. Not because integrations are hidden, but because there are no separate systems to integrate.

Integrations required: 0
Scenario

A consultant looked at interactive proposal tools twice and walked away both times — once because of seat pricing, once because of the integration burden. Then she realised the deal surface already existed inside the platform she'd been using for CRM, nurture, calendar, and billing. Nothing to integrate. Nothing to set up. Her first Clinch deal went out the same week.

See how Clinch works Explore the CRM →
Standalone approach
Proposal Tool CRM Calendar E-Signature Invoicing Onboarding
5+ integrations to maintain
Inside Zyntro
One platform boundary
CRM Calendar Clinch Docli Edge Flow OB1
0 integrations
Clinch in action
Clinch: Zyntro's Deals Engine video thumbnail
03 Deal Experiences

Deals built where the relationship already lives

A flat document compresses the entire relationship into a single shape. A segmented deal lets each part of the conversation have its own space — scope, pricing, case studies, personal context, next steps — without compressing any of it.

Fiduciary Advisor

The retirement conversation, fully modelled

The deal opens with your investment philosophy on video. A Curated Resource module provides market context. The retirement projection Artefact uses their actual numbers — they explore it, adjust assumptions, see outcomes change. The fee schedule sits below with embedded acceptance. They commit inside the experience. No separate document. No context switch.

Video Curated Resources Artefact Fee Schedule Acceptance
B2B Key Account

Every stakeholder finds their section

A key account expansion deal where the CFO navigates to the ROI modelling segment, the technical lead opens the integration architecture, and procurement finds terms and conditions. One deal, multiple readers, each finding the depth relevant to their decision. Engagement tracking shows you exactly who opened what, and when.

ROI Model Architecture Case Study Terms Stakeholder Tracking
Coach / Consultant

Methodology first, pricing last

The engagement deal opens with methodology — how you work, what changes. An outcomes segment shows what previous clients achieved. An interactive assessment Artefact lets the prospect explore their own readiness. Engagement structure and pricing close the experience. The same deal works as a live walkthrough in presenter view.

Methodology Outcomes Assessment Artefact Pricing Presenter View

Multi-segment composition

Graphics, text, embeds, video, pricing tables — each segment holds one part of the conversation.

Embedded Artefacts

Personalised, interactive models using their actual data — explored, not just read about.

Inline acceptance

Pricing blocks with embedded acceptance conditions. They commit within the deal experience.

Presenter view

The same deal becomes a guided walkthrough. Send or present — no separate deck needed.

Explore Clinch Learn about Artefacts →
04 The probability problem

The number in your CRM is a guess. Every decision downstream is built on it.

Every pipeline review, every sales forecast, every revenue projection in your world includes a probability attached to each open deal. The number is in your CRM. The number drives hiring, capacity planning, cash flow projection, what you tell your accountant, what you tell your team.

The number is also a guess. The deal creator looked at the deal, thought about how the last conversation felt, typed "70%" into a field, and moved on. Every downstream decision is built on top of a number a human typed while looking at the ceiling.

Pipeline reviews are exercises in collective guessing→ observable behaviour

Forecasts are grounded in typed intuition→ engagement signal

Deals slip past recovery because nobody noticed→ decay alerts fire

Clinch's decay tracking is not "alert me when my client goes cold." It is the architectural fix to the probability problem. It monitors how each deal is actually behaving — which sections the prospect viewed, how long they spent, how many times they returned, where they paused, when they stopped opening it. The behaviour pattern is a measurable signal. Probability stops being a guess and starts being a function of what the deal is actually doing.

A deal opened three times in 48 hours with twelve minutes on pricing and two returns to scope has a measurable probability profile. A deal opened once and never touched again is a different signal entirely. The system reads both. The human typing a number cannot.

Scenario

A B2B principal walks into Monday's leadership meeting with eight open deals. Six have typed probabilities. Two are blank. Clinch shows the actual engagement reality — three "high probability" deals untouched for eleven days, and one "low probability" deal opened seven times with twenty-three minutes on the integration section. The forecast they present is no longer a collection of guesses. It is grounded in what each deal is actually doing.

See how Clinch tracks deal behaviour →
Pipeline — 6 open deals Typed probability
Meridian Partners — Retainer
70%
0 opens · 11d silent
Northfield Group — Advisory
85%
1 open · 14d decay
Apex Logistics — Integration
25%
7 opens · 23m on integration
Coastal Ventures — Onboarding
60%
3 opens · 12m on pricing
Harlow & Reed — Expansion
75%
2 opens · 9d since last
Summit Digital — Scope Review
—
5 opens · 18m total · scope ×3
05 The Continuous Arc

From meeting to onboarding without touching a separate tool

The path from "I had a great conversation" to "the deal is in their inbox" is manual at every step in the PDF world. Not because of missing features — because every stage requires a separate system.

The PDF world — every step is manual
  • Conversation ends
  • Open laptop
  • Find template
  • Customise
  • Check
  • Attach to email
  • Send
  • Hours pass
  • Momentum cools
Meeting Google Meet / PWA Context Extracted Meeting Observer Deal Assembled Clinch You review Client Accepts Clinch Agreement Signed Docli Invoice Paid Edge Onboarding Flow + OB1 Hands-off — chain executes automatically
Coach

Discovery call ends on Google Meet. By the time she walks to the kitchen, a draft deal is assembled from the conversation context. Reviewed and sent in 18 minutes. Signed by Friday. Invoice paid. Welcome sequence fired. She never opened a template.

18 min from call to deal sent
Realtor

Saturday property tour with the PWA recording. By Sunday morning, a customised buyer representation deal is ready. Signed Sunday afternoon. He never opened a laptop on the weekend. The momentum from the walkthrough carried straight through to commitment.

Deal signed without opening a laptop
Consultant

Coffee meeting with a long-time prospect. PWA running discreetly. By the time she returns to the office an hour later, the engagement deal is ready to review. The conversation is still warm. The deal reflects what was actually discussed, not what a template assumed.

Deal ready before returning to office

From meeting to onboarding, the entire arc is hands-off — not because Zyntro automates more, but because the entire arc lives inside one platform. There are no handoffs between systems because there are no separate systems.

06 Evidence

What Changes When the Deal Lives Inside the Platform

Three roles. Three workflows. The same architectural shift — observed, not promised.

0%
Faster Deal Cycle

Average reduction in time from proposal sent to agreement signed, across all deal types on the platform.

0×
Proposal-to-Close Rate

Clinch deals convert at 3.2× the rate of PDF proposals — because engagement data replaces guesswork in follow-up.

0 min
Saved Per Deal

Time recovered from eliminating manual chasing, separate e-sign tools, and status-check calls per deal.

Real Estate Agent
Before

Sends a listing presentation as a PDF attachment. Checks email obsessively for three days. Manually chases the listing agreement in a separate tool. No visibility into whether the prospect even opened it.

After — With Clinch

The deal is sent from Clinch. Engagement is visible in real time — the prospect spent nine minutes on the comparable market analysis. The listing agreement triggers automatically on acceptance. No separate tools. No chasing.

Financial Advisor
Before

Sends a fee schedule in an email attachment. Calls the prospect three days later to ask if they received it. The conversation starts from zero — no idea what the prospect cared about or even read.

After — With Clinch

The deal shows the prospect spent fourteen minutes on the investment philosophy section and returned to the fee schedule twice. The advisor calls with a specific, informed conversation. The IPS agreement is one click away.

B2B Principal
Before

Asks the team for pipeline updates. Receives a spreadsheet of guessed probabilities. No one knows which deals are actually alive and which are polite ghosts. Forecasting is fiction.

After — With Clinch

The pipeline shows behavioural engagement data for every open deal. Decay is visible. Active interest is measurable. The Monday review takes twelve minutes instead of an hour — and the forecast is grounded in evidence.

"I stopped using three separate tools the week I started sending deals through Clinch. The listing agreement, the engagement tracking, the follow-up — it's all just there. I didn't realise how much time I was losing to context-switching until it stopped."

Sarah L.
Licensed Real Estate Agent

"The moment I could see that a prospect had gone back to the fee schedule three times, everything about my follow-up changed. I wasn't guessing anymore. That single insight probably doubled my close rate on advisory agreements."

Marcus R.
Independent Financial Advisor
See how Clinch works →
07 See it run

The argument is architectural.
The proof is seeing it run.

Pick a time and we'll walk you through a Clinch deal built for your practice — inside the same platform that runs your CRM, your calendar, your e-signatures, your billing, and your onboarding.

Request a walkthrough
No credit card
30 min walkthrough
Built for your practice
08 THE ARCHITECTURE UNDERNEATH

Clinch is not a product.
It is a surface.

The deal experience you have been exploring does not exist because Zyntro built a better proposal tool. It exists because Zyntro built the platform underneath — and Clinch is one surface of that architecture.

ZYNTRO PLATFORM RELATIONSHIP INTELLIGENCE CRM Calendar Meeting Observer Library Knowledge Mandates Docli Edge Flow OB1 Clinch
CRM The relationship lives here
Calendar The meeting lives here
Meeting Observer The conversation context lives here
Centralised Library The brand identity lives here
Reusable Knowledge The substance lives here
Mandates The behavioural rules live here
Docli The signature lives here
Edge The invoice lives here
Flow & OB1 The onboarding lives here
Clinch The deal lives here

None of these are separate products that integrate. They are surfaces of one architecture. The CRM does not "sync" with the deal tool — the deal tool reads the same relationship record. The meeting notes do not "export" into the proposal — the proposal draws from the same conversation context. The brand identity does not get "uploaded" to another system — it governs every surface from one place.

You have stayed in the PDF world because every alternative was a separate product. A standalone proposal tool that needed to be fed data from your CRM, styled to match your brand, and then tracked in yet another dashboard. The alternative you have been waiting for is not a separate product. It is the deal surface of the platform you are already using for everything else.

What if I am not on Zyntro yet?

Then Clinch is one of the reasons to evaluate the platform — not a feature that requires prior commitment. The deal surface is one of the reasons the platform exists. Start with the deal experience. The rest of the architecture is already there when you need it.

Explore Clinch

If you want to talk through how this fits your practice — how the architecture maps to the way you actually work — pick a time. No deck. No demo script. Just a conversation about whether this solves the problem you already know you have.

Schedule a conversation

Common counterpoints

The PDF is not bad. It is invisible. It lands in an inbox alongside 147 other messages, gets opened once (maybe), and then gets buried. You have no idea which page they read, whether they shared it, or when they lost interest. The problem is not the format — it is the blindness. You are making the most important business decision of the quarter based on whether someone replies to an email. Clinch does not replace the document. It replaces the silence after you send it.
Simple deals still carry context. The client still has a history with you. They still had a conversation that led to this moment. A "simple" deal sent as a flat PDF strips all of that context and asks the client to remember why they said yes. Clinch carries the context forward — not because the deal is complex, but because the relationship is. The simpler the deal, the more the experience around it matters.
Surveillance is watching someone without their knowledge for your benefit. Professional attentiveness is knowing when someone needs your help and showing up at the right moment. When a client opens your deal, lingers on the pricing section, and then closes it — the professional response is not to ignore that. It is to follow up with clarity. Clinch gives you the signal. What you do with it is what separates attentiveness from intrusion. The alternative — sending a deal into a void and following up blindly three days later — is not more respectful. It is just less informed.
So do we. The conversation is where trust is built, where needs are understood, where the real decision happens. But the formality that follows the conversation — the thing that gets sent, reviewed, signed, and paid — deserves to be worthy of the relationship that preceded it. Right now, the moment of highest trust (the conversation) is followed by the moment of lowest craft (the PDF). Clinch does not replace the conversation. It honours it.

The deal experience that finally honours the relationship — built into the same platform that built the relationship.